Surreal Innocence: CocoRosie at the ‘Sco

By Alice Beecher

Photo by Alexander Bianchi.

“If Cher were an indie band, she would be CocoRosie” so says one audience member of the hypnotic, operatic, and beautifully surreal CocoRosie show at the ‘Sco this Saturday. Fans came pouring into the slightly overcrowded venue with tribal face paint and outfits weird and sparkly enough to merit their share of second glances, even by Oberlin standards. They were well prepared—a CocoRosie show is as much a visual experience as it is a musical phenomenon.

The band didn’t get started until 11 p.m., to the chagrin of some inpatient concertgoers. They opened with a song that involved both beat-boxing and opera singing, which set the stage for the rest of the night. Projected on a video screen in the background were images of carnival swings and budding flowers, later offset by eerie scenes of fire and severed eyes.  Every once in a while, the mood of the images would switch, shaping the emotional impact of each song and leaving the audience as nostalgic as they were disturbed. The entire concert conjured up an atmosphere of youthful memories made strange and incomprehensible by the onslaught of adulthood. Sierra (Rosie) sang in a precious, girlish tremor balanced by propulsive hip-hop beats and gritty lyrics about being “candied from the inside.”

The crowd embraced the ghostly carnival atmosphere by dancing like gypsies or staring transfixed at Coco’s emphatic performance. The energy picked up when a Bowie-esque beat boxer started soloing, somehow layering percussive rhythms under choral like singing as impressive as Coco’s own soaring high notes. His performance highlighted the complexity of CocoRosie’s sound—at once primeval and modern, like a fairy kingdom transmuted to the modern age. Many of the songs followed a similar structure, but the passion and visual impact of the band kept the show from getting boring.

Their best performance was in the song ‘Animals,” in which Coco repeated the refrain, “I would spend a lot of time alone / I should be among the animals,” as if by returning to a primitive state she could be as free and wild as she desired. The beauty of the melody was balanced by the genres that define CocoRosie—a mix of everything from electro pop to eastern music to hip hop to opera.

Although the sisters did not come together to make music until later in their lives, their shared childhood undoubtedly affected their current artistic personalities.  Told to drop out of high school by a mother who believed the pursuit of art would teach them more than school ever could, the girls started experimenting with their art and sound early on.  Their common influences and experiences, including moving around the country throughout their childhoods and being exposed to their father’s interest in Native American spiritualism, both affect their music and bond them as performers. At one point, the two started playing a handclapping game—a reminder of their ties as sisters and their shared history.

CocoRosie are also famous in the fashion world for their eccentric style and gender-neutral outfits—in many music videos they dress up as men or soldiers. At the ‘Sco, they stayed feminine, wearing long diaphanous veils and multicolored face paint. However, one of the most memorable images projected during the concert was a picture of Bianca’s mustachioed face lying down as a caterpillar crawled over her skin.  I’m not sure what the deeper meaning behind this was, though it elicited a visceral reaction from the audience. But it is this mixture of the disturbing and the playful that defines CocoRosie as artistic pioneers. They make music that pushes boundaries while still making us wistful for our own childhoods, a duality as thought provoking as it is beautiful.

Athletics Update: Sept. 12-19, 2010

By Nick Perry

Field Hockey (4-1) currently has the best record of the fall teams. Photo from goyeo.com

Football

The football team is off to an astonishing 1-1 start despite being on the road for the first two weeks of the season. OC won their season opener for the first time since 1997 with a 29-26 overtime win over Kenyon before suffering a 31-14 defeat to College of Wooster this past Saturday. Obviously, I have yet to see the team play, but from what I gather from scouring  GoYeo and through basic logic is that the defense and running game is struggling significantly; an unfortunate drawback for a passing offense that has racked up 500 yards in the past two games. Sophomore quarterback Josh Mandel has led a reasonably productive offense throwing for 6 touchdowns–including a 4 TD game against Kenyon–compared to 5 interceptions. The kid also threw for 335 yards against Kenyon. Pretty damn impressive–maybe we will win a few this year. OC football heads to Hiram next weekend before coming back for Homecoming weekend on October 2 against Wittenberg.

Men’s and Women’s Cross Country

All I know about cross country is that these OC teams throw damn good parties. I understand that competitors run distances considered dangerous for people of my physical fitness level and try to be the fastest to run these distances. But as far as scoring, qualifying for higher levels and uniforms, I’m totally clueless. So here’s what I gather about the men’s and women’s cross country teams up to this point using the least specific language I can so as to not insult XC jargon.

First, and I believe foremost, the men’s team have recently been ranked 31st in the nation by the United States Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association (USTFCCCA, which defeats the purpose of an acronym). An impressive feat for a homely little liberal arts college in Ohio with more hipsters than trees. Both the men’s and the women’s teams placed well at the GLCA Championships at Ohio Wesleyan last weekend, with the men placing first and the women second.

Both teams head to Carnegie Mellon next weekend to run train at the Carnegie Mellon Invite.

Women’s Volleyball

The Women’s (Oberlin doesn’t have Men’s Volleyball) Volleyball team has sneakily been playing matches almost daily over the past two and a half weeks and has managed to accumulate a 1-11 record, the lone win coming against Earlham last Saturday. The team plays Otterbein at home on Tuesday night at 7 before playing four matches at Hiram next weekend.

Men’s and Women’s Tennis

You may have heard about the Oberlin Women’s Invitational happening this weekend. Here’s what went down: Farah Leclercq ’13, Carolyn Ball ’12, and Ariel Lewis ’12 were women’s singles winners on Day 1. Both women’s doubles teams; Julie Christensen ’13 and Preeya Shah ’13, and Leclercq and Finley Gates ’12, were victorious as well. On Day 2, Shah and Gates each won her match, and Leclerq and Lewis were again both victorious on Day 3.

According to GoYeo, the Men’s Tennis team has no news except for John ’61 and Carl Erikson ’94 winning their seventh major title on the USTA Father-Son Circuit. And proud we are of them. But you may look forward to the Men’s Oberlin Invitational on October 2nd and 3rd.

Field Hockey

The field hockey team is fucking shit up! You probably didn’t know that, did you? They’re 4 and fucking 1 (1-1 in conference.)! With a goal differential of 22 to 6! I want to see everybody on Thursday the 23rd tailgating the hell out of the Kenyon game. GO OC GO OC GO!

Men’s and Women’s Soccer

Soccer is my favorite sport and, besides football and maybe field hockey now, really the only OC varsity sport that I’ll ever enjoy watching. As such, I’ve been to every men’s home game and all but one women’s home game. And no, it’s not always easy to go. The women have struggled to a 1-6 (0-0 conference) start after winning the season opener against Mount Union. They have only scored four goals for the season and have had immense difficulty keeping the ball out of their own half. Nobody seems to have a set position, as head coach Kristen Hayden continuously experiments with different players in different spots. Sadly, the winning formula is still mysterious to Hayden and the Yeowomen.

The men have staggered out of the gate as well. Fighting a number of injuries, the Yeomen have crawled to a 3-5 start (0-0 conference). They have been outscored by opponents 14-7 and have had difficulty finding a bona fide goal scorer. Justin Griffiths ’13 leads the team with 3 goals, but has been severely limited by a bad knee and–he probably didn’t know I knew this, but I’m a friend of his GF–a nasty abdominal hernia.

In the home games I’ve seen, the midfield has been the Achilles’ heel, getting consistently out-hustled and outplayed. They have lacked the chemistry to possess upfield, choosing to rush through balls and send long, ambitious passes to the almost always outnumbered forwards. The defense, anchored by captain Wyatt Hayman ’11, has been bailed out a number of times by keeper Zach Lipshultz ’11 but seemed to have made considerable progress over the last week in working out the kinks during the team’s 2-1 victory over Case Western on Saturday. People have actually showed up to the night home games, making some noise and heckling opponents like a mid-sized high school crowd.

This week, the men play Muskingum on Wednesday before coming back to Fred Shults Field on Saturday to take on Earlham at 7 PM.

The women play Heidelberg at 7 PM on Fred Shults Field on Tuesday and Earlham at noon on Saturday.

Lunch Break Art Therapy

By Alice Beecher

A Salvador Dali painting, from allforthegreatergood.com.

“As a species, we’ve always turned to the arts to transform our suffering,” says Randall K. James, sitting in a workroom littered with looms and boxes of clay pastels. Paid for by the Student Finance Committee (i.e. free for you) James is a licensed art therapist here to provide students with a creative outlet and a sense of catharsis.

After spending years teaching and working with the juvenile offender community, James has developed the patience and intuition needed to provide a good remedy for anxiety. A key to his practice is to provide a sense of freedom and openness—when you walk into the art therapy studio, you aren’t required to participate in the activity he schedules, nor will you be evaluated on the work you do there.

Unlike other forms of psychological care that seek to diagnose a specific problem and provide quantifiable evidence of therapeutic “success,” art therapists tend to view their patients more holistically. Instead of separating the emotional self from the body’s physiological processes, art therapists see psychological disorders in the context of the larger person, emphasizing the use of creation as a way to visually process trauma. Since the visual cortex is strongly linked to the emotion processing limbic system, this concept makes a lot of sense.

At the session I attended, James asked us to introduce ourselves by drawing a picture of our ‘internal worlds.’ While the prompt seemed vague at first, I found that as I drew, my thoughts became clearer and lighter than they’d ever been in the weeks since I arrived on campus. By creating something tangible out of the mind’s chaos, you learn that stress is something one can release and control. In addition, the practice of sharing drawings with other participants creates a kind of community that is often hard to find at Oberlin—one where people admit that they might not actually have all their shit together after all.

Art therapy sometimes lacks the credibility of traditional psychological care because the effect of creativity is subjective to the individual artist/patient.  In Ohio, art therapy is listed as ‘recreational therapy.’  Furthermore, art therapists cannot collect insurance or receive a degree. Since there is no standardization of the art therapy educational curriculum, licensing agencies do little more than mark art therapy as a subset of counseling.

Our culture requires concrete evidence to prove that care is useful, but personal growth is often too complex to chart in quantifiable diagrams. Luckily for us, these political issues have not distracted James from his “calling”, and his willingness to aid the Oberlin student body with warmth and humor is clear from the outset.  I would advise any over committed/overwhelmed first-year to check out these sessions, if only to talk to James for a little while. A kind ear and some oil paint are sometimes all you need to get your life back in order.

Sessions with Randall James continue in Wilder through Wednesday, September 22nd.

Civil Rights Focus on Constitution Day

By Shane Hisner

Thomas Perez. Photo by Shane Hisner.

Thomas Perez, the Assistant Attorney General of the United States’s Civil Rights Division, delivered an explosive Constitution Day speech in West Lecture Hall on Thursday. The longtime civil rights lawyer had no shortage of things to talk about in his speech titled, “Why we need a Civil Rights Division in the year 2010.”  From immigration to LGBT rights to the Americans with Disabilities Act, Perez eloquently laid out the causes that he has spent a career in public service fighting for.

President Krislov, whose friendship with Perez dates back to their time together in the Civil Rights Division over 20 years ago, introduced Perez as “the very model of a selfless public servant and an engaged and active American citizen.”

From the beginning, his tone was commanding. Perez was quick to lay out his position on the Constitution. “It is a document that is very near and dear to my heart.” He went on, “If we were to poll test some of the provisions of the Constitution today, they probably wouldn’t poll very well.” This assertion became the underlying theme of Perez’s address.

“There are times in our nation’s history when we are sailing into headwinds. Right now we are sailing into a significant headwind,” declared Perez. To drive his point home, he spoke primarily about cases he and the Civil Rights Division have worked on in the last year–cases that shed light on the pressing, even scary, issues confronting civil rights today.

He told stories of heinous racially-driven hate crimes–a father-son duo assaulting an African-American with a chainsaw in South Carolina, the police cover-up of a racially-driven murder of a Latino in Pennsylvania, a mosque burned to the ground in Tennessee, a re-segregated school district in Mississippi. “This isn’t America in 1969 and 1970. This is America in 2009 and 2010,” Perez emphasized after every story.

He spoke about the less blatant issues the Civil Rights Division addresses, such as predatory loans targeting African-Americans, an issue that strikes a chord for Clevelanders especially. His compassion was palpable as he spoke of the families “under water because of these toxic loans.”

Perez directly addressed the issues surrounding immigration in the Southwest, damning Senate Bill 1070 in Arizona as unconstitutional. “There is one quarterback when it comes to immigration, and that quarterback is the United States Government…because immigration decisions have foreign policy consequences, law enforcement consequences, humanitarian consequences.”

Perez, who has worked in the Civil Rights Division for the last four presidential administrations, had much to say concerning the traditional non-partisanship of the judiciary. “I was on the hiring committee (of the Civil Rights Division) in 1992 under the elder Bush, and in 1993 and ‘94 under President Clinton. Our mission was identical, and that was, ‘Hire the most qualified people.’”

That non-partisan tradition “broke down” under the second Bush. “The process was hijacked,” disclosed Perez, who emphatically expressed satisfaction in the Obama Administration for returning non-partisanship to the Civil Rights Division.

As to the question of why we need a Civil Rights Division in the year 2010, he was quite frank. “The first time I was asked that question, I didn’t take it seriously. Quite honestly, for me it was self-evident…I couldn’t understand why people would ask that question.” When the question continued cropping up in conversation, Perez says, was when he began considering it “part of his job to educate people about why we still need a Civil Rights Division.

“We have indeed made a lot of progress, and we should be proud of the progress we have made as a nation, but we have indeed so much longer to go. The journey to equal opportunity is a long journey and a hard journey, but it’s a journey we must go on to give meaning to the Constitution,” Perez asserted.

There was, perhaps, one hiccup in his otherwise inspiring presentation when a gentleman from the American Civil Liberties Union asked about Guantanamo Bay during the Q&A. Perez spoke vaguely. “We are attempting to move forward as fairly and constitutionally and expeditiously as possible.” He cited the contentious political atmosphere surrounding the issue as one roadblock concerning this issue.

His message to Oberlin students was a clear one. “We need people like you that are going to turn headwinds into tailwinds. I hope you use this university campus to have that robust debate about the meaning of the Constitution…We’re going to need people fighting for civil rights in the future. I hope you will be those people tomorrow.

Perez ended his speech with a dose of humor. “I’m getting old, I need a knee replacement, I’ve got no hair, and I need your help.”

Rising Above Adversity is Beautiful: a Preview of Theater and Dance’s Beautiful Thing

Beautiful Thing Poster

Theater and Dance's Beautiful Thing

Issues within the LGBT community have always been something to which the student body here at Oberlin has paid attention. And for faculty member and chair of the Theater department Matthew Wright, these issues are personal; he has been fighting against bigoted ignoramuses for many years, and one of the ways he’s currently fighting them is by directing Theater and Dance’s next main stage production, Beautiful Thing, written by Jonathan Harvey.

So, why choose this play, Matthew Wright? “I’m passionate about this play because it’s about young gay people who: 1) are not ignorant to the fact that, in certain circumstances, their gayness subjects them to violence and bigotry; 2) aren’t defeated by this fact; 3) are proud of who they are. The biggest lie/mythology around gayness is that gay boys are all ‘pussies’ (how many times did I hear that when I was growing up!) and wimps, and gay women are all bruisers with no fashion sense. To own one’s gayness and dance under the scrutiny of the public eye is one of the great acts of courage. And, by the way, some of the hottest women in the world are out and proud.”

So why is this “gay play” different from others? “This play is populated with people who don’t blame anyone for their circumstances and who are busy rising above the odds in every moment. And it’s a play that illustrates with great certainty that humor is the saving grace of the gay community. We listen to peoples’ stupidity and endless harangues about the moral reprehensibility of our lifestyles and we say, ‘fuck you, what would you do without my big gay color sense?’ What can be better than that ability to rise above it?”

This is certainly true. Oberlin has a prominent LGBT population, and is often assumed to be a place where people do rise above adversity. So why is it important to do Beautiful Thing on such an open campus? “Oberlin has a reputation as a safe haven for young gay adults. I think that’s deserved. I also think that Oberlin’s status as a ‘gay destination’ makes it vulnerable to unrealistic thinking…Here, in this safe place, we sometimes forget that people are dying because their desires don’t meet with the majority’s approval. I have been the victim of peoples’ bigotry and hate-related violence. I assure you that such horror still happens…and it happens even on this campus.”

And even though a majority of people who will attend this play already support the LGBT community, Wright says that the goal of this play is not just to garner additional moral support: “We may, to a small degree, be preaching to the choir. But the choir needs to hear it so they go out and make the world a better place for everyone.”

But can a sweet, comical play like Beautiful Thing have as big of an impact as other more heart wrenching plays that deal with the same subject matter? “I’m relieved that this play has: 1) a happy ending; 2) an uplifting message; 3) relatively sweet humor. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s important that the Matthew Shepherd stories are out there. I think it’s of historic importance that we have a whole cannon of gay AIDS drama. But I also think it’s important to see two high school boys fall in love and get to have the fantasy fulfilled.”

There are people in the college and community who might feel that by doing a “gay play,” there is an exclusive message being broadcast to the audience. This is certainly not the case, insists Wright: “I once had a colleague tell me that he couldn’t relate to Angels in America because it was a gay love story. My response to that is: does that mean I can’t relate to Romeo and Juliet? I defy anyone to watch the story of Jamie and Ste – this play’s protagonists – and not be affected by their bravery and joyous love.”

Make sure you see Beautiful Thing, running in Hall Auditorium April 22-24 at 8 p.m., and April 24th at 2 p.m. Tickets can be purchased at Central Ticketing Services at Hall Auditorium or online. In advance, tickets are $4 for Students, $6 OCID/Seniors, and $8 for the public.  Make sure not to miss what is sure to be an important play in Oberlin’s theater season this year.

Dr. Robert Sapolsky at Finney as Final Convocation Speaker

Photo by Carolyn Weinstein

By: Nick Perry

When Dr. Robert Sapolsky of Stanford University asked a packed Finney Chapel how many people had a family history of heart disease and cancer on Thursday night, nearly everybody raised a hand. However, when asked about a family history of leprosy and dysentery, all hands went down.

“We are not like normal mammals,” Sapolsky told the crowd. “We don’t get sick like normal mammals, we don’t die like normal mammals.” Sapolsky’s convocation, Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers: A Guide to Stress, Stress-Related Diseases, and Coping, discussed the evolution of stress study and how humans have a penchant for causing their own stress.

Stress study is a relatively recent field, explained Sapolsky, and was not fully advanced until scientists began to ask “totally bizarre questions like ‘what’s your psychological makeup,’ or ‘what’s your social status,’ or ‘how are people of your social status treated in society.’” When examining these questions, Sapolsky argued, the exacerbation of diseases can be directly correlated to stress.

When homeostatic balance is lost, animals become stressed and, in the short-term, they turn on the stress response. Humans, however, are a rare animal that turn the stress response on if they “think [their] body is going to be knocked out of homeostatic balance.” Unlike 99% of animals, humans turn the short-term stress response on all the time because they have the capacity to look to the future and complain about it. For this reason, said Sapolsky we are the most vulnerable mammals to stress-related disease.

Sapolsky outlined seven effects of the typical stress response. When an animal is under immediate duress it rapidly mobilizes energy from fat cells, increases its cardiovascular tone, enhances its immune system, sharpens its cognition and alertness, and suppresses digestion, growth, and reproduction. In a stressful situation, all of these steps must occur or, Sapolsky explained, “you’ve got like a 30 second life expectancy.” But humans abuse the stress response and often get sick as they run into what Sapolsky referred to as the “exhaustion phase” when the body is working out of homeostatic balance for too long. While a human will never run out of adrenaline, Sapolsky–in a tribute to Oberlin leftism–argued that the problem is that “after while you’re spending so damn much on your military that you don’t give as much to healthcare and social services.

Sapolsky offered a number of stress-related disorders to each adaptive stress response. By suppressing stress and hostility, disorders such as adult onset diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis can take root in humans. Stress also impairs ability to repair ulcers and suppresses growth. Sapolsky discussed a child who suffered from psychogenic dwarfism while growing up in a stressful, unloving environment, but began to grow when he developed a feeling relationship with a nurse who was studying him. Incredibly, when she left for a two week vacation, the boy stopped growing, only to resume as soon as she returned. This case spoke volumes to the influence of companionship on reducing stress.

Reproductive functions are also thrown off by the stress response, Sapolsky argued. Studies have shown that females under constant stress can begin to run low on estrogen and lose the ability to ovulate. Stressed out males tend to develop erectile dysfunction because, as Sapolsky stated, “In order to get an erection you have to be calm and vegetated.”

Stress can contribute to memory loss, depression, and the endangerment of neuronal development, as well. Since the body releases dopamine when under stress to enhance alertness, if a person is continuously under stress his or her ability to produce a happy feeling becomes inhibited, and neurons can become damaged.

Although stress is related to many diseases, Sapolsky emphatically insisted that it has absolutely no link to cancer as was once thought.

In his concluding statements, Sapolsky presented a study performed on lab rats that examined the development of ulcers on rats in a stressful environment. The experiment put rats in a cage and shocked them at random. The study found that rats who were shocked alone, without warning, were at significantly greater risk of developing ulcers. Meanwhile, rats that were permitted to have an outlet had very reduced chances of getting ulcers. From the study it was concluded that there are specific psychological modifiers to the stress-response. Outlets for frustration, a sense of control, a perception of life improving, and social support can significantly lower stress levels.

Sapolsky reminded the crowd that “none of us are ever going to be stressed running away from saber-toothed tigers, none of us are going to be wrestling for canned food items at the supermarket, instead you’re going to have the luxury to sit around and invent these psycho-social stressors.” He urged people to never be socially isolated because you will become stressed. Humans, Sapolsky claimed, are “smart enough to invent this stuff, and foolish enough to fall for it,” making us very prone to stress-related disorders, and constantly in need of modifiers to the stress-response.

Black and Blues Inspires and Illuminates

By Sasha Schechter

oberlin.edu

From March 11-13, Little Theater was home to Black and Blues, an original artistic collaboration created and directed by Visiting Assistant Professor of Theater Justin Emeka.  The piece includes dance, song, and scene revolving around Black History and the transition of “Africans” to “Black Americans.”

Black and Blues has an immensely talented cast of artists and takes its audiences on a journey through the African American experience, starting at slavery and leading up to today.  The combination of movement, music, and dialogue from the actors had a powerful impact; where words failed to portray the necessary emotions, there was a song or a dance that compensated beautifully.

The choreography, by Jessica Judson ’10 and James Pressley ’12, held aspects of Capoeira, contact improvisation, and modern dance.  Dance was a central aspect of the piece and was essential when the audience attempted to fully comprehend the stories and their emotions.

Halfway through the show, the lights dimmed, and the omnipresent projectors played a clip of an old minstrel act.  The men of the ensemble played a scene over the projections that was the simultaneously shocking and striking; they applied blackface and danced stereotypically in place, gluing smiles onto their faces underneath their bright red lipstick.

Black and Blues was filled with these kinds of moments; the show was book ended with the main acting ensemble chanting about their blues–their struggles with the world at large and how it conflicts with their identities–and the way they still have to deal with them every day.  They shouted about how they laugh to keep from crying.  The message was heartfelt and hit the audience in a way that was unsettling and personal.

This production’s artistic unification was its high point; this show managed to combine all aspects of theater, music, and dance to create a historical, cultural environment. The emotions presented to the audience ranged from desperate and uncomfortable to joyous and passionate.  The show encouraged audience response, and it received plenty of it from audience members of all backgrounds.

But the conversations dominating the audience that I heard as I left gradually shifted from this show’s artistic brilliance to another topic: Why did the director and performers think a show such as this one was necessary at Oberlin?  There has been a marked divide in theatrical productions here recently between “neutral” shows and shows specifically intended to bring racial issues forward.

Many shows here have attempted to spark discussion about racial issues at Oberlin and in the world at large, while others have often been perceived as ignoring or hiding the race of their performers.  Seldom has there been a show that attempts to acknowledge race, while also exploring other issues.  Do you think this division exists in Oberlin Theater?  If so, what are the ramifications? Post a comment with what you think. What needs to change?

Karen Florini ’79 Shares Insight on Climate Policy

By David Roswell

Photo by David Roswell

Karen Florini ’79  presented an optimistic yet realistic view into federal climate change policy last Thursday in Hallock Auditorium.  Speaking in her personal capacity, she outlined how Washington can pass a climate bill in 2010.  With confidence, she said that a bill could be passed this year, emphasizing that, “it is hard but there is real hope.”

She started by speaking about the obstacles to passing a climate bill.  She first pointed to Senator Inhofe of Oklahoma and his friends such as Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and their deep-pocketed partners, Fox News and the Chamber of Commerce; right wing organizations with vested interests in preventing a climate bill.  She then spoke about the healthcare bill suffocating Washington, which is preventing anything from moving forwards.

“Cap and trade is dead, and we’re glad,” declared Florini, speaking broadly for environmentalists in Washington.  She updated the audience on the Kerry-Boxer bill, which would have mandated a federal, comprehensive cap and trade system, saying it was stuck, with no hope of headway.  It would have given a limited and diminishing number of permits to polluters, and allowed trade of these permits between firms.

In lieu of the Kerry-Boxer bill, a new bill, still in its very infant stages, is being co-written by Senators John Kerry of Massachusetts (D), Joe Lieberman of Connecticut (I), and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina (R).  The bill, still only an unreleased, ten-page document, calls for sector specific caps, beginning with utilities.

This idea has garnered broader support than previous climate bills, with positive responses from vital players, from Senator Baucus, chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, to Mary Landrieu of Louisiana (D), who is one of the least environmentally friendly democrats in the senate (and supported by Louisiana gas and oil companies) and even some Republicans.

“If you’re anti-nuke, I’m sorry, get over it,” began Florini’s list of concessions environmentalists will have to make for this, or any other climate bill, to be passed this year, because, “it’s clear that several key Senators are going to need nuclear subsidies in order to be able to vote for climate legislation.”  The authors of the bill are also considering offshore drilling opportunities for states to bring in additional revenue.

One of the big challenges for viable legislation is the future of the existing Clean Air Act.  After an EPA inquiry found that greenhouse gas emissions pose a threat to human health, the EPA was required to regulate emissions.  However, this ruling is being threatened, primarily by Lisa Murkowski of Alaska (R), who has issued a formal resolution of disapproval on the EPA’s endangerment finding.  The finding is “a predicate to essentially all regulatory action under the Clean Air Act; if you don’t have a finding, you can’t issue regulations,” explained Florini. If the House adopts this resolution of disapproval, the Clean Air Act will never have regulatory power again.  Fortunately, Obama will surely veto it, but the process is eating up time and energy, and diverting focus from the main issues.

Florini presented a laundry list of reasons for hope.  Increasing technology, earth day initiatives, and better communication between political figures are all reasons for hope.  The support from the Pentagon is also key in making change this year.

Another reason for hope is a bill that is already written.  Susan Collins of Maine and Maria Cantwell of Alaska have introduced a cap and dividend bill, with a linkage fee for transportation fuels. This system will auction off permits for utilities to emit greenhouse gases.  The revenue generated will be split into two, with 75% going to cash payments to the American people, and the remaining 25% being invested into green energy technology.  The linkage fee for transportation will be added on to fuel prices somewhere along the supply chain; the price will be determined by the allowances under the cap.

After the talk, the audience was invited to ask questions.  When asked about what scientists should be doing to push policy, Florini said there is no new science that needs to be done to prove to people that climate change is real.  What should be done, she said, is a distillation of all of the information for the public down to three key facts: greenhouse gases trap heat, there are more greenhouses gases than before, and the gases are coming from people.  However, she pointed out, “If there was a tablet from Moses that said, ‘Here’s how to do climate legislation,’ there would still be vociferous opposition.”  When pressed about how environmentalists can win, she said, “We win by fighting.”

Florini ended her talk by outlining its take-home messages. “Climate legislation is hard, there is real hope, and get busy—now.”

DRAG BALL CANCELED

By David Edward Clark

oberlin.edu

Drag Ball has been canceled this year due to lack of student participation in the planning and lack of proper funding due to chartering process issues.

“My best hope is that it’ll be a shock in a way that really energizes people to make a change and commit to spending some time organizing the event,” said Sarah Chase ‘10, the sole member of the Drag Ball Committee.  “It has a home on campus; people just need to figure out if they want to really own it.”

Dean of Students Linda Gates gave this statement via email concerning why Drag Ball was cancelled:

Last year after DB, a number of us met several times with the two DB organizers (including this year’s organizer) and we were very clear: if students did not charter the group, did not plan and organize the event in advance, and did not procure funding through procedures that all student organizations use to fund their activities, Drag Ball would be in jeopardy.  When none of those things happened, those of us who participated in that discussion—including this year’s sole student organizer—reached consensus that Drag Ball should be canceled for spring 2010.

Student Finance Committee has a policy that an organization cannot take ad hoc money for more than two years in a row without becoming chartered, but “Drag Ball was always kind of the exception to that rule,” said Chase.  In the past, Drag Ball has asked for and received ad hoc money from Student Finance Committee, Student Union Board and the Forum Board.

Haley Laws ’09 began the chartering process.  “It got stopped somewhere in the process–which is a frustratingly slow process,” said Chase, who is uncertain why Drag Ball was not chartered in the past, “but it didn’t seem to be needed until recently.”

Chase revised Laws’ charter application and submitted it to Student Life Committee in January; however, the General Faculty Committee will not meet to discuss chartering new organizations until March 17th.

“I have great hope that it will be back next year,” said Chase, who sees a full and dedicated committee as necessary for this to happen as a charter.  Chase believes lack of student support comes from the fact that “people don’t realize it needs so much support, and that’s a huge problem.” The administration will be happy to see the return of Drag Ball as soon as the organization fulfills the proper requirements of student groups.

“If everyone has a better idea of the history and the politics and the needs of the event, they will be able to act more effectively to make it happen in the future,” said Chase, who plans to write a book on Drag Ball so future Oberlin generations know the ins and outs of the event and can throw the party properly.  Chase plans to start scheduling next year’s Drag Ball this semester.

Chase hopes for drag-themed events this semester.  There are still plans for performers to come to the ‘Sco for a much smaller engagement.  “I want people to know that this is not Drag Ball, that they need to work for Drag Ball,” said Chase when asked whether this is just a toned down version of the event, but “It’s definitely in the spirit of celebrating drag and gender and queerness and genderfucking and all that stuff.”